Australian Antarctic Division Conditions of Use | Requests | About us | Site map
Forgot Your Password?
Username:  
Password:
Australian Antarctic Data Centre

Antarctic Gazetteer

Search Antarctic Names

A catalogue of Antarctic Names from the SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica, the Australian Antarctic Gazetteer and lists of other less formal names.
Search
About
Policy
Related sites

Search

If you note any errors and/or omissions in any names, please see the 'About' tab for any followup actions.

Name
Allow a case sensitive search
Highlight any matches Yes No
Search includes the Narrative/Description
Catalog Reference Number - if you know the reference number, then enter it here
Feature Type
Spatial Coverage
Northernmost Latitude North South
Southernmost Latitude North South
Westernmost Longitude West East
Easternmost Longitude West East
Examples of entering positions are described in How to enter latitude/longitude positions
Select coverage by picking a Named location in Antarctica or the sub-antarctic
Restrict names
within a specific Region
Country of origin
Include the following
Gazetteers
Australian Antarctic Gazetteer - includes Macquarie and Heard islands
The SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica (places south of 60 deg south)
Compilation of various sub-Antarctic Gazetteers (official names) - (places north of 60 deg south)
GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN) Gazetteer
Informal Antarctic/sub-Antarctic Gazetteer (unofficial names)
Report options
Latitude
Longitude
Coordinate Accuracy (m)
Show Positions in
Deg Min Sec or
Decimal degrees

Altitude
Altitude Accuracy (m)
Feature Type
Narrative/Description
Gazetteer
Status
Status Notes
Region
SCAR Gazetteer ID
Source of location of name
Other source details (Institution, Person, Country, Scale, Type, Publisher etc.)
Output Format -- If Excel, Word or KML, enter its filename (ignoring extension)
Number of records - control the number of records displayed per page (ignored for KML output format)
Order the results by

About

The Australian Antarctic Names and Medal Committee (AANMC) is the authority on Australian names in the Australian Antarctic Territory, and the Territory of Heard Island and the McDonald Islands. It is responsible for the investigation and acceptance or rejection of all names proposals following prescribed procedures. These proposals must meet certain criteria in order to be accepted.

Names for features in the Australian Antarctic Territory and the Territory of Heard Island and the McDonald Islands are considered by the AANMC and are approved subject to confirmation by the Minister or Parliamentary Secretary responsible for Antarctic matters before being officially recognised. The names may then be used on maps and in reports. Names for Macquarie Island are considered by the Committee and then referred with recommendations to the Nomenclature Board of Tasmania, the authority for names on Macquarie Island.

The Australian Antarctic gazetteer has been compiled over a period of nearly sixty years. In that time it has developed from a hard copy printed list of names to a web based service, readily downloaded and searched by the general public. While all care has been taken to ensure completeness of the data it is acknowledged that there may on rare occasions have been errors and/or omissions in the compilation of the data, and input from the public is both sought and welcomed on any mistakes that might be believed to have occurred. Persons who believe that there may be such deficiencies in the records are requested in the first instance to contact the Mapping Officer at the Australian Antarctic Division via our request data base at http://data.aad.gov.au/aadc/feedback/feedback.cfm, providing clearly articulated reasons and any other relevant materials to support their belief. The Mapping Officer may request additional information from the enquirer before undertaking an investigation into any alleged discrepancy.

On completion of the investigation the Mapping Officer will convey the results of such an investigation to the Australian Antarctic Names and Medal Committee for action as appropriate. The Committee will review the results of the investigation and will decide on outcome, and this decision will then be provided to the enquirer.

Naming Policy

Existing names

When ANARE established its first continental station at Mawson, the Australian Antarctic Territory had already been explored to some extent by British, French, American, German, Australian, Norwegian and Russian parties.

As a result, some features had already been named by more than one nation, and others had already been given non-Australian names which were already in common use e.g. Windmill Islands, Vincennes Bay, and other names appearing in the Hansen Atlas and in the records of the US Navy's Operation Highjump.

In general, the Australian position has been that the first name given to a feature would be accepted. This position prevails today, and where, for example, a Chinese name may have been given to a mountain it is unlikely that Australian names would be approved for lesser features on the same massif.

Where a foreign name exists, it will be preserved in a transliterated form to render it into English e.g. Soldat Island near Davis has not been translated into Soldier Island, and the Russian Charts show the Four Ladies Bank directly translated into Russian phonetics to sound like 'four ladies'.

Naming Procedures

Anyone may propose a new name but procedures for naming and criteria for names must be considered. Proposals for new names may be made to the AANMC by completing the Antarctic Name Proposal form which should then be submitted to the Mapping Officer, Australian Government Antarctic Division (details in the form). Following research by the Mapping Officer, proposals are submitted to the AANMC for consideration at the annual meeting in May. If a new name is approved, it is sent to the Minister responsible for Antarctic Matters for ratification.

Unnamed geographical features should not be given names unless considered by the AANMC and approved by the Minister. Such features should be distinguished by describing their location in relation to adjacent well known features and referred to as such on maps and diagrams and in all reports.

Information required for those proposing place names include criteria, classification of features, guidelines on the use of appropriate names, descriptive and non-descriptive names, personal names and guidelines for features already named.

These guidelines should be read as governing the application of Antarctic place-names. In general, persons suggesting place-names should incline to non-personal names, although consideration will be given to submissions of place-names received in 2002-3, as these took place before the Committee adopted the new approach.

Persons with questions regarding the general issues of place-name procedures should consult the AAD's mapping officer.

Criteria

In general, names proposals are considered by AANMC having regard to the following criteria:

Classification of features

Features in Antarctica are, for the purposes of allocating place-names, grouped into three broad categories:

First order features

Because of the present state of geographical knowledge, it is unlikely that there are remaining features in this category.

Second order features

Third order features

Appropriate Types of Names

In selecting possible non-personal place names, the first consideration should be what to avoid. Names of descriptive shape or colour such as Basalt Pinnacle, Gravel Bay (although this exists at Davis!) and Broad Valley should be avoided as these could be mistaken for general descriptions. (There are many examples of this on terrestrial Australia - e.g. several dozen Stony Creeks and Dry Creeks). Also, one should attempt to avoid names already in use, even prefixing these with such words as 'new' or 'little' e.g. 'Mawson East'. There is, for example, already a plethora of 'Law' (Law Dome, Law Base, Law Beach)

Similarly, avoid names of pets and commercial products, names with two generic terms (e.g. Crag Rock) and names in obvious bad taste.

With these reservations, the following suggestions could be considered:

Descriptive and Non-Descriptive Names

Preference should be given to considering a descriptive rather than a personal name for a feature.

There is widespread agreement among the Treaty Nations that the use of names of living persons (other than persons of high standing in the international community) should not be used. Similarly, the Committee for Geographical Names in Australasia, which is responsible for the co-ordination of place naming in Australia and New Zealand (other than the Australian Antarctic Territory and Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands), has taken the view that:

"If personal names are to be used for geographical features the person commemorated should have contributed significantly to the area or state where the feature is located; and where a personal name is used it should be applied only posthumously. Names of living persons are by their nature subject to partisan perception and change in community judgement and acceptance. The adoption of a personal name during the lifetime of a person concerned should only be made in exceptional circumstances."

Accordingly, the AANMC will normally only consider personal names for third order features and then only if a compelling case can be made for the name in question. The person whose name is being proposed must have made an outstanding contribution to the Australian Antarctic Program to be considered and the onus is on the nominator(s) to establish this claim.

Guidelines for Personal Names

First order features

Second order features

Third order features

It is clear from the above that there must be very convincing reasons for seeking to allocate the name of a living person to a feature in the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands. It is acknowledged that this represents a 'tightening' of procedures from earlier years of Australian Antarctic endeavour, but it also reflects the current trends in approaches by Antarctic Treaty Nations and by the practice of the Committee for Geographical Names in Australasia.

New name form

Complete the Antarctic Name Proposal form and return it to the mapping officer (contact details are in the form).

Related Sites